linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] dt-bindings: ufs: Document bindings for SA8255P UFS Host Controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c0e654d8-bb4a-4d4e-9d67-3664e6ea0aca@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 10:27:28 +0530
From: Ram Kumar Dwivedi <ram.dwivedi@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, mani@...nel.org,
        alim.akhtar@...sung.com, avri.altman@....com, bvanassche@....org,
        robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
        James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
        anjana.hari@....qualcomm.com
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 2/3] dt-bindings: ufs: Document bindings for SA8255P
 UFS Host Controller



On 11-Dec-25 12:04 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 10/12/2025 16:50, Ram Kumar Dwivedi wrote:
>> +
>> +allOf:
>> +  - $ref: ufs-common.yaml
>> +
>> +unevaluatedProperties: false
>> +
>> +examples:
>> +  - |
>> +    #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> +
>> +    soc {
>> +        #address-cells = <2>;
>> +        #size-cells = <2>;
> 
> Not much improved... Same comments. And if you repeat "we plan" or
> "something else is something else" than answer will be the same - that
> something else does not matter and we do not care about plans.
> 
> By useless disagreements you just postpone the acceptance of this
> patchset. Especially about such nits... patch could have been reviewed
> already :/

Hi Krzysztof,

I have changed it to single-cell addressing in latest patchset.

Thanks,
Ram.




> 
>> +
>> +        ufshc@...4000 {
>> +            compatible = "qcom,sa8255p-ufshc";
>> +            reg = <0x0 0x01d84000 0x0 0x3000>;
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof