linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6.18 000/430] 6.18.3-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20251231010932.91680-1-ojeda@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 02:09:32 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
To: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: achill@...ill.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	broonie@...nel.org,
	conor@...nel.org,
	f.fainelli@...il.com,
	hargar@...rosoft.com,
	jonathanh@...dia.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux@...ck-us.net,
	lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
	patches@...nelci.org,
	patches@...ts.linux.dev,
	pavel@...x.de,
	rwarsow@....de,
	shuah@...nel.org,
	sr@...dewatkins.com,
	stable@...r.kernel.org,
	sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.18 000/430] 6.18.3-rc1 review

On Mon, 29 Dec 2025 17:06:42 +0100 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.18.3 release.
> There are 430 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Wed, 31 Dec 2025 16:06:10 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Boot-tested under QEMU for Rust x86_64, arm64 and riscv64; built-tested
for arm and loongarch64:

Tested-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>

For arm32, it is possible to get build errors if one tries to build Nova
so I sent a backport request for consideration:

    https://lore.kernel.org/stable/CANiq72=ti75ex_M_ALcLiSMbfv6D=KA9+VejQhMm4hYERC=_dA@mail.gmail.com/

(And for completeness/future reference: for UML, which I build-test as
well but so far do not report here, there are a few `rustdoc` issues
which will get resolved with:

    https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/CANiq72nScSLkB0ix6Rw=SfpqDirx_GgcCzgHLucKd0d=s5aZ0w@mail.gmail.com/

)

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel