lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0949ad6f-d703-47c9-8681-c64f17da07ac@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 07:46:40 +0100
From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol@...nel.org>
To: John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
 Helge Deller <deller@....de>, Greg Kroah-Hartman
 <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
 Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>
Cc: linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] video/logo: allow custom boot logo and simplify logic

On 31/12/2025 at 00:19, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
> 
> On Tue, 2025-12-30 at 23:19 +0100, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
>> This series allows the user to replace the default kernel boot logo by
>> a custom one directly in the kernel configuration. This makes it
>> easier to customise the boot logo without the need to modify the
>> sources and allows such customisation to remain persistent after
>> applying the configuration to another version of the kernel.
> 
> Wouldn't it make more sense to make the boot logo to be configurable
> at runtime so that users don't have to rebuild their kernel at all
> to change their boot logo?

I thought about that. The problem is that the logo is loaded really
early in the boot process. To be able to modify the logo without
rebuilding the full kernel, the logo would basically need to become a
kernel module that would be stored in either an initrd or on the filesystem.

The above is not impossible, but would require delaying the logo.

If we go in that direction, I think that my series as it is right now
would be a prerequisite anyway. Personally, I am happy with the logo
just being configurable when compiling the kernel, so I do not intend to
put more effort into this afterward. However, that would have prepared
the ground if anyone wants to implement in the future what you just
suggested.


Yours sincerely,
Vincent Mailhol


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ