[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <DFCAD4LVB5RF.3PI81T1E0OIID@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 10:14:45 +0100
From: "Luca Ceresoli" <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
To: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>, "Akhil
R" <akhilrajeev@...dia.com>, "Herbert Xu" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, "Thierry Reding"
<thierry.reding@...il.com>, "Jonathan Hunter" <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
"Mikko Perttunen" <mperttunen@...dia.com>, "David Airlie"
<airlied@...il.com>, "Simona Vetter" <simona@...ll.ch>, "Sowjanya
Komatineni" <skomatineni@...dia.com>, "Mauro Carvalho Chehab"
<mchehab@...nel.org>, "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] host1x: Make remove callback return void
Hello Uwe,
On Wed Dec 10, 2025 at 9:31 AM CET, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The return value of struct device_driver::remove is ignored by the core
> (see device_remove() in drivers/base/dd.c). So it doesn't make sense to
> let the host1x remove callback return an int just to ignore it later.
>
> So make the callback return void. All current implementors return 0, so
> they are easily converted.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com>
Tested-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com> # tegra20 tegra-video
Reviewed-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
--
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists