[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aVUiw34NAG3OfOV8@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 14:18:59 +0100
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>
To: Waiman Long <llong@...hat.com>
Cc: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@...wei.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Chen Ridong <chenridong@...wei.com>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,
Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/33] PCI: Prepare to protect against concurrent
isolated cpuset change
Le Sun, Dec 28, 2025 at 10:53:41PM -0500, Waiman Long a écrit :
> On 12/28/25 10:23 PM, Zhang Qiao wrote:
> > > if (node < 0 || node >= MAX_NUMNODES || !node_online(node) ||
> > > pci_physfn_is_probed(dev)) {
> > > - cpu = nr_cpu_ids;
> > > + error = local_pci_probe(&ddi);
> > > } else {
> > > cpumask_var_t wq_domain_mask;
> > > + struct pci_probe_arg arg = { .ddi = &ddi };
> > > +
> > > + INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&arg.work, local_pci_probe_callback);
> > > if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&wq_domain_mask, GFP_KERNEL)) {
> > > error = -ENOMEM;
> > If we return from here, arg.work will not be destroyed.
> >
> >
> Right. INIT_WORK_ONSTACK() should be called after successful cpumask_var_t
> allocation.
Doing that, thank you both!
--
Frederic Weisbecker
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists