[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dd7fcfb8-a47e-4e3c-9769-714659e002a7@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 16:01:03 +0530
From: Akhila YS <akhilayalmati@...il.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mtd: microchip,mchp23k256: convert to DT
schema
On 02-01-2026 15:48, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 02/01/2026 09:17, Akhila YS wrote:
>>>> +properties:
>>>> + compatible:
>>>> + enum:
>>>> + - microchip,mchp23k256
>>>> + - microchip,mchp23lcv1024
>>>> +
>>>> + reg:
>>>> + maxItems: 1
>>>> +
>>>> + "#address-cells":
>>>> + const: 1
>>>> +
>>>> + "#size-cells":
>>>> + const: 1
>>> Pretty incomplete. Old binding and above cells claim there can be child
>>> nodes, so please add them and test. Works? No. Shall work? Yes... so
>>> either old binding was incorrect or new binding is incomplete. I did not
>>> check the driver, though.
>>
>> Size cells and Address cells are not required as there is no child node
> Then what is the point of address/size cells if you do not have children?
>
> Anyway, read carefully old binding and the driver code.
Yes, I will remove the above cells in the next revision.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
--
Best Regards,
Akhila.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists