[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f0344520-3234-4285-b971-f8cd9955ba90@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 18:24:51 +0000
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Anand Moon <linux.amoon@...il.com>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kwilczynski@...nel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
"open list:PCI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:TEGRA ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] dt-bindings: PCI: Convert nvidia,tegra-pcie to DT
schema
On 24/12/2025 12:41, Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> Thanks for your review comments.
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2025 at 11:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On 15/12/2025 15:15, Anand Moon wrote:
>>> Convert the existing text-based DT bindings documentation for the
>>> NVIDIA Tegra PCIe host controller to a DT schema format.
>>
>> You dropped several properties from the original schema without
>> explanation. That's a no-go. I don't see any reason of doing that, but
>> if you find such reason you must clearly document any change done to the
>> binding with reasoning.
>>
> Well, I have tried to address the review comments from Rob
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2025/9/26/704
>
> Actually /schemas/pci/pci-pci-bridge.yaml# covers most of the PCIe binding
> So I had not included them, as it would duplicate
FWICT you are missing all the Tegra specific power supplies and so those
will not be found in the above file. I have not checked if you are
missing others too.
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists