linux-kernel - Re: Can we sort out the prototypes within the cifs headers?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1460704.1767379422@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2026 18:43:42 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Enzo Matsumiya <ematsumiya@...e.de>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, Paulo Alcantara <pc@...guebit.org>,
    Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
    Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@...rosoft.com>,
    Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
    netfs@...ts.linux.dev, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
    linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Can we sort out the prototypes within the cifs headers?

Enzo Matsumiya <ematsumiya@...e.de> wrote:

> +1 for the cleanups, thanks for doing that.
> 
> On backports, I think points 1-3 could be done together, but in separate
> commits (per header file) to minimise conflicts.
> 
> 4 looks good to have.

Hi Enzo,

Could you have a look at:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cifs/20251222223006.1075635-1-dhowells@redhat.com/T/#t

see if you're okay with it?

Thanks,
David