lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260102190657.GT3864520-mkhalfella@purestorage.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 11:06:57 -0800
From: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@...estorage.com>
To: Randy Jennings <randyj@...estorage.com>
Cc: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@...dia.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>,
	Aaron Dailey <adailey@...estorage.com>,
	John Meneghini <jmeneghi@...hat.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 06/14] nvme: Rapid Path Failure Recovery read
 controller identify fields

On Wed 2025-12-31 14:26:39 -0800, Mohamed Khalfella wrote:
> On Thu 2025-12-18 07:22:41 -0800, Randy Jennings wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 25, 2025 at 6:13 PM Mohamed Khalfella
> > <mkhalfella@...estorage.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > TP2028 Rapid path failure added new fileds to controller identify
> > TP8028
> 
> Fixed.
> 
> > > response. Read CIU (Controller Instance Uniquifier), CIRN (Controller
> > > Instance Random Number), and CCRL (Cross-Controller Reset Limit) from
> > > controller identify response. Expose CIU and CIRN as sysfs attributes
> > > so the values can be used directrly by user if needed.
> > >
> > > TP4129 KATO Corrections and Clarifications defined CQT (Command Quiesce
> > > Time) which is used along with KATO (Keep Alive Timeout) to set an upper
> > > limite for attempting Cross-Controller Recovery.
> > "limite" -> "limit"
> 
> Fixed.
> 
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mohamed Khalfella <mkhalfella@...estorage.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/nvme/host/core.c  |  5 +++++
> > >  drivers/nvme/host/nvme.h  | 11 +++++++++++
> > >  drivers/nvme/host/sysfs.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  3 files changed, 39 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> > > index fa4181d7de73..aa007a7b9606 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> > > @@ -3572,12 +3572,17 @@ static int nvme_init_identify(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
> > >         ctrl->crdt[1] = le16_to_cpu(id->crdt2);
> > >         ctrl->crdt[2] = le16_to_cpu(id->crdt3);
> > >
> > > +       ctrl->ciu = id->ciu;
> > > +       ctrl->cirn = le64_to_cpu(id->cirn);
> > > +       atomic_set(&ctrl->ccr_limit, id->ccrl);
> > Seems like it would be good for the target & init to use the same
> > name for these fields.  I have a preference for these over
> > instance_uniquifier and random because they are more concise, but
> > the preference is not strong.
> 
> The field names in the spec are concise, but they are also cryptic.
> 
> > 
> > > +
> > >         ctrl->oacs = le16_to_cpu(id->oacs);
> > >         ctrl->oncs = le16_to_cpu(id->oncs);
> > >         ctrl->mtfa = le16_to_cpu(id->mtfa);
> > >         ctrl->oaes = le32_to_cpu(id->oaes);
> > >         ctrl->wctemp = le16_to_cpu(id->wctemp);
> > >         ctrl->cctemp = le16_to_cpu(id->cctemp);
> > > +       ctrl->cqt = le16_to_cpu(id->cqt);
> > >
> > >         atomic_set(&ctrl->abort_limit, id->acl + 1);
> > >         ctrl->vwc = id->vwc;
> > I cannot discern an ordering to the attributes set here.  Any
> > particular reason, you placed cqt away from the others you added?
> 
> No reason. Moved ctrl->cqt initialization up with other fields.
> 
> > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/sysfs.c b/drivers/nvme/host/sysfs.c
> > > index 29430949ce2f..ae36249ad61e 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/sysfs.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/sysfs.c
> > > @@ -388,6 +388,27 @@ nvme_show_int_function(queue_count);
> > >  nvme_show_int_function(sqsize);
> > >  nvme_show_int_function(kato);
> > >
> > > +static ssize_t nvme_sysfs_uniquifier_show(struct device *dev,
> > > +                                         struct device_attribute *attr,
> > > +                                         char *buf)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > +
> > > +       return sysfs_emit(buf, "%02x\n", ctrl->ciu);
> > > +}
> > > +static DEVICE_ATTR(uniquifier, S_IRUGO, nvme_sysfs_uniquifier_show, NULL);
> > > +
> > > +static ssize_t nvme_sysfs_random_show(struct device *dev,
> > > +                                         struct device_attribute *attr,
> > > +                                         char *buf)
> > > +{
> > > +       struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > +
> > > +       return sysfs_emit(buf, "%016llx\n", ctrl->cirn);
> > > +}
> > > +static DEVICE_ATTR(random, S_IRUGO, nvme_sysfs_random_show, NULL);
> > > +
> > > +
> > >  static ssize_t nvme_sysfs_delete(struct device *dev,
> > >                                 struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf,
> > >                                 size_t count)
> > > @@ -734,6 +755,8 @@ static struct attribute *nvme_dev_attrs[] = {
> > >         &dev_attr_numa_node.attr,
> > >         &dev_attr_queue_count.attr,
> > >         &dev_attr_sqsize.attr,
> > > +       &dev_attr_uniquifier.attr,
> > > +       &dev_attr_random.attr,
> > >         &dev_attr_hostnqn.attr,
> > >         &dev_attr_hostid.attr,
> > >         &dev_attr_ctrl_loss_tmo.attr,
> > > --
> > > 2.51.2
> > >
> > 
> > These are the names used in the target code (uniquifer & random.
> > I'd rather have them match (identify structure will have spec's
> > abbreviations; ctrl & debug/sysfs for target & initiator either be
> > ciu/cirn or uniquifer/random.
> 
> I think it matters for sysfs attributes. I do not know the right thing
> to do. Should we use spec names like "cirn" or call it "random"?

Now I am thinking about it, I think sticking to the spec's abbreviations
makes more sense here. names like "random" and "uniquifier" in sysfs are
not descriptive enough. I changed struct member names, sysfs, and
debugfs file names to match the spec.

> 
> > 
> > But this is small stuff.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Randy Jennings <randyj@...estorage.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ