linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Runtime TDX Module update support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8d7817ea-317c-4ddb-bb5c-a7b2fab1ad3d@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2026 13:15:33 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
 "Gao, Chao" <chao.gao@...el.com>, "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
 "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
 "yilun.xu@...ux.intel.com" <yilun.xu@...ux.intel.com>,
 "Chatre, Reinette" <reinette.chatre@...el.com>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
 "Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>, "Annapurve, Vishal"
 <vannapurve@...gle.com>,
 "linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev" <linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev>,
 "paulmck@...nel.org" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
 "nik.borisov@...e.com" <nik.borisov@...e.com>,
 "sagis@...gle.com" <sagis@...gle.com>
Cc: "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "tglx@...utronix.de"
 <tglx@...utronix.de>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
 "kas@...nel.org" <kas@...nel.org>, "pbonzini@...hat.com"
 <pbonzini@...hat.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>,
 "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/21] Runtime TDX Module update support

On 1/2/26 12:52, Edgecombe, Rick P wrote:>> Would you be able to take a
look at this series when you get a
>> chance? I'd appreciate your feedback.
> I can't apply it. The source commit is gone from the tsm repo, but 
> besides that it requires applying a bunch of dependencies.
If there are dependencies, is this the right thing for reviewers to be
spending time on? Shouldn't they be making sure the dependencies are
reviewed and merged first?