[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <38c3ef0d-c330-4e33-87aa-a34acd878c87@fnnas.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2026 18:23:47 +0800
From: "Yu Kuai" <yukuai@...as.com>
To: <linan666@...weicloud.com>, <song@...nel.org>, <neil@...wn.name>,
<namhyung@...il.com>
Cc: <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<k@...l.me>, <yangerkun@...wei.com>, <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
<yukuai@...as.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 05/13] md/raid1,raid10: support narrow_write_error when badblocks is disabled
Hi,
在 2025/12/15 11:04, linan666@...weicloud.com 写道:
> From: Li Nan <linan122@...wei.com>
>
> When badblocks.shift < 0 (badblocks disabled), narrow_write_error()
> return false, preventing write error handling. Since narrow_write_error()
> only splits IO into smaller sizes and re-submits, it can work with
> badblocks disabled.
>
> Adjust to use the logical block size for block_sectors when badblocks is
> disabled, allowing narrow_write_error() to function in this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan122@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai@...as.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid1.c | 8 ++++----
> drivers/md/raid10.c | 8 ++++----
> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid1.c b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> index bd63cf039381..8e0312fad3a2 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid1.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid1.c
> @@ -2503,17 +2503,17 @@ static bool narrow_write_error(struct r1bio *r1_bio, int i)
> * We currently own a reference on the rdev.
> */
>
> - int block_sectors;
> + int block_sectors, lbs = bdev_logical_block_size(rdev->bdev) >> 9;
> sector_t sector;
> int sectors;
> int sect_to_write = r1_bio->sectors;
> bool ok = true;
>
> if (rdev->badblocks.shift < 0)
> - return false;
So, I just realize patch 3 missed this change, patch 3 itself is not correct in
the case badblocks is not enabled.
Please also move this patch before patch 3.
> + block_sectors = lbs;
> + else
> + block_sectors = roundup(1 << rdev->badblocks.shift, lbs);
>
> - block_sectors = roundup(1 << rdev->badblocks.shift,
> - bdev_logical_block_size(rdev->bdev) >> 9);
> sector = r1_bio->sector;
> sectors = ((sector + block_sectors)
> & ~(sector_t)(block_sectors - 1))
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid10.c b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> index db6fbd423726..e1f63f4f1384 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid10.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid10.c
> @@ -2790,17 +2790,17 @@ static bool narrow_write_error(struct r10bio *r10_bio, int i)
> * We currently own a reference to the rdev.
> */
>
> - int block_sectors;
> + int block_sectors, lbs = bdev_logical_block_size(rdev->bdev) >> 9;
> sector_t sector;
> int sectors;
> int sect_to_write = r10_bio->sectors;
> bool ok = true;
>
> if (rdev->badblocks.shift < 0)
> - return false;
> + block_sectors = lbs;
> + else
> + block_sectors = roundup(1 << rdev->badblocks.shift, lbs);
>
> - block_sectors = roundup(1 << rdev->badblocks.shift,
> - bdev_logical_block_size(rdev->bdev) >> 9);
> sector = r10_bio->sector;
> sectors = ((r10_bio->sector + block_sectors)
> & ~(sector_t)(block_sectors - 1))
--
Thansk,
Kuai
Powered by blists - more mailing lists