[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20260103122151.157174-1-zilin@seu.edu.cn>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2026 12:21:51 +0000
From: Zilin Guan <zilin@....edu.cn>
To: hansg@...nel.org
Cc: ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Markus.Elfring@....de,
Zilin Guan <zilin@....edu.cn>,
Jianhao Xu <jianhao.xu@....edu.cn>
Subject: [PATCH v2] platform/x86/amd: Fix memory leak in wbrf_record()
The tmp buffer is allocated using kcalloc() but is not freed if
acpi_evaluate_dsm() fails. This causes a memory leak in the error path.
Fix this by using the scope-based cleanup helper __free() for automatic
resource cleanup. This ensures that both the tmp buffer and the ACPI
object are automatically freed when they go out of scope, simplifying
error handling and preventing leaks.
Fixes: 58e82a62669d ("platform/x86/amd: Add support for AMD ACPI based Wifi band RFI mitigation feature")\
Suggested-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Suggested-by: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Co-developed-by: Jianhao Xu <jianhao.xu@....edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Jianhao Xu <jianhao.xu@....edu.cn>
Signed-off-by: Zilin Guan <zilin@....edu.cn>
---
Changes in v2:
- using scope-based cleanup helper __free() for automatic resource cleanup.
drivers/platform/x86/amd/wbrf.c | 21 ++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/wbrf.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/wbrf.c
index dd197b3aebe0..4517d139d768 100644
--- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/wbrf.c
+++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/wbrf.c
@@ -39,11 +39,11 @@ static const guid_t wifi_acpi_dsm_guid =
*/
static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(wbrf_chain_head);
+DEFINE_FREE(acpi_object, union acpi_object *, if (_T) ACPI_FREE(_T))
+
static int wbrf_record(struct acpi_device *adev, uint8_t action, struct wbrf_ranges_in_out *in)
{
union acpi_object argv4;
- union acpi_object *tmp;
- union acpi_object *obj;
u32 num_of_ranges = 0;
u32 num_of_elements;
u32 arg_idx = 0;
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static int wbrf_record(struct acpi_device *adev, uint8_t action, struct wbrf_ran
*/
num_of_elements = 2 * num_of_ranges + 2;
- tmp = kcalloc(num_of_elements, sizeof(*tmp), GFP_KERNEL);
+ union acpi_object *tmp __free(kfree) = kcalloc(num_of_elements, sizeof(*tmp), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tmp)
return -ENOMEM;
@@ -101,25 +101,20 @@ static int wbrf_record(struct acpi_device *adev, uint8_t action, struct wbrf_ran
tmp[arg_idx++].integer.value = in->band_list[i].end;
}
- obj = acpi_evaluate_dsm(adev->handle, &wifi_acpi_dsm_guid,
- WBRF_REVISION, WBRF_RECORD, &argv4);
+ union acpi_object *obj __free(acpi_object) =
+ acpi_evaluate_dsm(adev->handle, &wifi_acpi_dsm_guid,
+ WBRF_REVISION, WBRF_RECORD, &argv4);
if (!obj)
return -EINVAL;
- if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) {
- ret = -EINVAL;
- goto out;
- }
+ if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER)
+ return -EINVAL;
ret = obj->integer.value;
if (ret)
ret = -EINVAL;
-out:
- ACPI_FREE(obj);
- kfree(tmp);
-
return ret;
}
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists