[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20260103123910.169563-1-zilin@seu.edu.cn>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2026 12:39:10 +0000
From: Zilin Guan <zilin@....edu.cn>
To: markus.elfring@....de
Cc: James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com,
don.brace@...rochip.com,
jianhao.xu@....edu.cn,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com,
storagedev@...rochip.com,
zilin@....edu.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] scsi: hpsa: Fix memory leak in hpsa_undo_allocations_after_kdump_soft_reset()
On Wed, Dec 31, 2025 at 05:25:23PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> …
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/hpsa.c
> > @@ -8212,6 +8212,7 @@ static void hpsa_undo_allocations_after_kdump_soft_reset(struct ctlr_info *h)
> > h->monitor_ctlr_wq = NULL;
> > }
> >
> > + kfree(h->reply_map); /* init_one 1 */
> > kfree(h); /* init_one 1 */
> > }
>
> I wonder about the alignment and relevance for these code comments.
>
> Regards,
> Markus
Hi Markus,
Thank you for your review.
Regarding the alignment, it was an oversight caused by the inconsistency
between my editor configuration and the Linux kernel's style. I will
correct this in v3.
As for the code comment, it indicates that the memory being freed here
was allocated during the first stage of initialization in
hpsa_init_one(). I included it to maintain consistency with the existing
kfree(h) line immediately following it.
Best regards,
Zilin Guan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists