[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aVkR_AG1fbZn4A7p@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2026 14:56:28 +0200
From: Andriy Shevencho <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jonathan Brophy <Professor_jonny@...mail.com>
Cc: Jonathan Brophy <professorjonny98@...il.com>,
lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Radoslav Tsvetkov <rtsvetkov@...dotech.eu>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-leds@...r.kernel.org" <linux-leds@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] leds: Add virtual LED group driver
On Sat, Jan 03, 2026 at 08:22:06AM +0000, Jonathan Brophy wrote:
> >I stopped with this, this patch is half-baked and unreviewable. Please, split
> >it to a few features and add one-by-one, for example:
>
> >- very basic sypport
> >- feature A
> >- ...
> >- debugfs
>
> >So I expect 3+ patches out of this one. And try to keep size of a change less
> >than 1000 LoCs.
>
> Thanks Andy
>
> You have given me some things to fix and some great advice I'm a very junior dev and
> I know nothing of the led subsystem before this project.
You're welcome!
> I think it may be best to use a function to generate a gamma tableĀ I was thinking a
> hard coded table may be a better idea for performance reasons with addressable rgb
> strips that I plan to implement in the future.
>
> I planned to split the driver into several files is this what you mean?
> it would logically break into files as part of the driver as follows:
>
> core.c
> arbitration.c
> phys.c
> vled.c
> debugfs.c
> virtualcolor.h
Fine by me, but I'm not a maintainer nor the authoritative person, you need to
wait for Jacek, and/or Lee, and/or Pavel to express their opinions.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists