[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1bd723858c5f8a0bea1239e837f902432fffd183.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Jan 2026 18:30:48 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: duoming@....edu.cn
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] scsi: ppa: Fix use-after-free caused by
unfinished delayed work
On Sun, 2026-01-04 at 22:35 +0800, duoming@....edu.cn wrote:
> On Sat, 03 Jan 2026 14:55:54 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ppa.c b/drivers/scsi/ppa.c
> > > > > index ea682f3044b..8da2a78ebac 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/scsi/ppa.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/ppa.c
> > > > > @@ -1136,6 +1136,7 @@ static void ppa_detach(struct parport
> > > > > *pb)
> > > > > ppa_struct *dev;
> > > > > list_for_each_entry(dev, &ppa_hosts, list) {
> > > > > if (dev->dev->port == pb) {
> > > > > + disable_delayed_work_sync(&dev-
> > > > > >ppa_tq);
> > > > > list_del_init(&dev->list);
> > > > > scsi_remove_host(dev->host);
> > > > > scsi_host_put(dev->host);
> > > >
> > > > This fix looks bogus: if there's an active workqueue on ppa
> > > > it's because there's an outstanding command and it's emulating
> > > > polling. If you stop the polling by disabling the workqueue,
> > > > the command will never return and the host will never get
> > > > freed, so this will leak resources, won't it?
> > >
> > > I believe that disabling the ppa_tq delayed work will not affect
> > > the Scsi_Host release process. The lifetime of the Scsi_Host is
> > > managed by tagset_refcnt. The tagset_refcnt is initialized to 1
> > > in scsi_add_host_with_dma() and decreased to 0 in
> > > scsi_remove_host(). since the delayed work callback
> > > ppa_interrupt() does not modify tagset_refcnt in any way, the
> > > host could be freed as expected.
> >
> > Not if something else holds a reference to the host, which an
> > outstanding command does. That's the point I was making above: as
> > long as the command doesn't return, everything is pinned and never
> > gets freed (well, possibly until timeout). You cause that because
> > the work queue is only active if a command is outstanding, so when
> > you disable the queue in that situation the command remains
> > outstanding and can never complete normally.
>
> When a request is sent to a SCSI device, a timer is set for the
> request. If it times out, the request is directly terminated and
> removed from the queue. The specific function call chain is as
> follows:
I know how timeouts work ... I don't need the AI summary. if there is
an outstanding command, the timeout will fire long after you've
disabled the queue and run through ppa_detach and the next thing that
will happen is the error handler will try to abort the command,
eventually causing ppa_abort to be called, which is going to
dereference the ppa_struct that ppa_detach freed.
Regards,
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists