[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260105133854.166d32b8@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 13:38:54 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Cosmin Tanislav <cosmin-gabriel.tanislav.xa@...esas.com>, Geert
Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the renesas tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r9a09g077.dtsi
between commit:
2d8568dddc7b ("arm64: dts: renesas: r9a09g077: Add ICU support")
from the renesas tree and commit:
9b1138aef9a2 ("arm64: dts: renesas: r9a09g077: Add ICU support")
from the tip tree.
I fixed it up (I arbitrarily used the former version) and can carry the
fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned,
but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream
maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want
to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to
minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists