[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72kXNUQtFRDHrcox2GK884mgux0CCntPo_r-gwxzkTNQHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 18:08:29 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Burak Emir <bqe@...gle.com>,
Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rust: bitops: fix missing _find_* functions on 32-bit ARM
On Mon, Jan 5, 2026 at 6:03 PM Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Which means, you're running active testing, which in turn means that
> Rust is in a good shape indeed. Thanks to you and Andreas for the work.
Yeah -- to clarify, we have been doing "active testing" for ~5 years,
even before Rust was in mainline, for several architectures and
configurations. :)
By the way, this reminds me I have to reply to your other message from
a while ago.
i.e. this "active testing" does not mean you don't need to test your branch.
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists