lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72kXNUQtFRDHrcox2GK884mgux0CCntPo_r-gwxzkTNQHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 18:08:29 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>
Cc: Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Burak Emir <bqe@...gle.com>, 
	Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>, Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, 
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>, 
	Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, 
	Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, 
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rust: bitops: fix missing _find_* functions on 32-bit ARM

On Mon, Jan 5, 2026 at 6:03 PM Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Which means, you're running active testing, which in turn means that
> Rust is in a good shape indeed. Thanks to you and Andreas for the work.

Yeah -- to clarify, we have been doing "active testing" for ~5 years,
even before Rust was in mainline, for several architectures and
configurations. :)

By the way, this reminds me I have to reply to your other message from
a while ago.

i.e. this "active testing" does not mean you don't need to test your branch.

Cheers,
Miguel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ