[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tiwlktsfpicrf3wg5yqvnxnrma3wgipqgkbfkrmj6w755fwpxy@bvxuofhdsemw>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 18:18:34 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Cc: brauner@...nel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, jack@...e.cz,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: only assert on LOOKUP_RCU when built with
CONFIG_DEBUG_VFS
On Mon 29-12-25 13:57:51, Mateusz Guzik wrote:
> Calls to the 2 modified routines are explicitly gated with checks for
> the flag, so there is no use for this in production kernels.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@...il.com>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Honza
> ---
> fs/namei.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
> index f7a8b5b000c2..9c5a372a86f6 100644
> --- a/fs/namei.c
> +++ b/fs/namei.c
> @@ -879,7 +879,7 @@ static bool try_to_unlazy(struct nameidata *nd)
> {
> struct dentry *parent = nd->path.dentry;
>
> - BUG_ON(!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU));
> + VFS_BUG_ON(!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU));
>
> if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_CACHED)) {
> drop_links(nd);
> @@ -919,7 +919,8 @@ static bool try_to_unlazy(struct nameidata *nd)
> static bool try_to_unlazy_next(struct nameidata *nd, struct dentry *dentry)
> {
> int res;
> - BUG_ON(!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU));
> +
> + VFS_BUG_ON(!(nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU));
>
> if (unlikely(nd->flags & LOOKUP_CACHED)) {
> drop_links(nd);
> --
> 2.48.1
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists