[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aVwzt9oFHgjSFUi3@google.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 21:57:11 +0000
From: Bing Jiao <bingjiao@...gle.com>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, longman@...hat.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
mhocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
muchun.song@...ux.dev, tj@...nel.org, mkoutny@...e.com,
david@...nel.org, zhengqi.arch@...edance.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, axelrasmussen@...gle.com,
chenridong@...weicloud.com, yuanchu@...gle.com, weixugc@...gle.com,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mm/vmscan: fix demotion targets checks in
reclaim/demotion
On Fri, Dec 26, 2025 at 06:48:20PM +0000, Bing Jiao wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2025 at 08:19:32PM -0500, Gregory Price wrote:
> > Have you run this through klp?
>
> I have not run it through klp. Will do it then.
>
> Thanks,
> Bing
Hi Gregory,
I tried to build a klp against kernel v6.16, but it ran into a
segfault during `create-diff-object` using kpatch-build v0.9.11.
I do not think it was caused by this patch. But I will try it
again at a later time.
Best,
Bing
Powered by blists - more mailing lists