lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEXW_YSxHnUxNXNiwBZRiVF9i5OBv7bV73e_k_RFJ3Osnrr18Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2026 19:34:34 -0500
From: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>
To: Zqiang <qiang.zhang@...ux.dev>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>, Donglin Peng <dolinux.peng@...il.com>, paulmck@...nel.org, 
	frederic@...nel.org, neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, 
	rcu@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Donglin Peng <pengdonglin@...omi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Align stall warning 'idle=' output with documentation

On Sun, Jan 4, 2026 at 7:32 PM Zqiang <qiang.zhang@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 04, 2026 at 04:10:27PM +0800, Donglin Peng wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > From: Donglin Peng <pengdonglin@...omi.com>
> > >
> > >  The RCU stall warning message includes an "idle=" field to indicate
> > >  the dyntick-idle state of a CPU. According to Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst,
> > >  the hexadecimal number before the first '/' represents the low-order 16
> > >  bits of the dynticks counter. An even value denotes that the CPU is in
> > >  dyntick-idle mode, while an odd value indicates otherwise.
[...]
> > >  kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > >  diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
> > >  index b67532cb8770..d25cc826d77a 100644
> > >  --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
> > >  +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_stall.h
> > >  @@ -555,7 +555,7 @@ static void print_cpu_stall_info(int cpu)
> > >  rdp->rcu_iw_pending ? (int)min(delta, 9UL) + '0' :
> > >  "!."[!delta],
> > >  ticks_value, ticks_title,
> > >  - ct_rcu_watching_cpu(cpu) & 0xffff,
> > >  + (ct_rcu_watching_cpu(cpu) >> ilog2(CT_RCU_WATCHING)) & 0xffff,
>
>
>
> May be also use CT_RCU_WATCHING_START to
> replace ilog2(CT_RCU_WATCHING) operations? (I didn't actually test it)

It should compile down to the same thing, but either is fine with me.

thanks,

 - Joel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ