linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: talos-evk: Add QCS615 Talos EVK SMARC platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d23e3693-0cf8-4b31-a3e4-e562621911d5@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 08:12:37 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: tessolveupstream@...il.com, andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: talos-evk: Add QCS615
 Talos EVK SMARC platform

On 04/01/2026 14:11, tessolveupstream@...il.com wrote:
> 
> 
> On 30-12-2025 20:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 30/12/2025 14:02, Sudarshan Shetty wrote:
>>> Add binding support for the Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Talos EVK
>>> SMARC platform based on the QCS615 SoC.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sudarshan Shetty <tessolveupstream@...il.com>
>>> ---
>>
>>
>> Why did you decide to drop the tag and where did you explain that?
>>
>> <form letter>
>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>
>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>>
>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
>> of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
>> significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
>> "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
>> list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
>> patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
>> tags received on the version they apply.
>>
>> Please read:
>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
>>
>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>> </form letter>
>>
> 
> I apologize for missing the Acked-by tag in this version.

How missing? It WAS THERE ALREADY!

You had to explicitly remove it.

> I will make sure to include all received tags in the next patch
> as per the submission guidelines.

Best regards,
Krzysztof