linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: cix: add OrangePi 6 Plus board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260105-excellent-uakari-of-joy-f0dfa4@quoll>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 09:21:08 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Gary Yang <gary.yang@...tech.com>
Cc: peter.chen@...tech.com, fugang.duan@...tech.com, robh@...nel.org, 
	krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-cix-kernel-upstream@...tech.com, 
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: cix: add OrangePi 6 Plus board

On Sun, Jan 04, 2026 at 03:53:59PM +0800, Gary Yang wrote:
> OrangePi 6 Plus adopts CIX CD8180/CD8160 SoC, built-in 12-core 64-bit
> processor + NPU processor,integrated graphics processor, equipped with
> 16GB/32GB/64GB LPDDR5, and provides two M.2 KEY-M interfaces 2280 for NVMe
> SSD,as well as SPI FLASH and TF slots to meet the needs of fast read/write
> and high-capacity storage
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gary Yang <gary.yang@...tech.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml | 11 +++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml
> index 114dab4bc4d2..9e132e609b7b 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml
> @@ -16,9 +16,16 @@ properties:
>    compatible:
>      oneOf:
>  
> -      - description: Radxa Orion O6
> +      - description: Radxa Orion O6 board
>          items:
> -          - const: radxa,orion-o6
> +          - enum:
> +              - radxa,orion-o6
> +          - const: cix,sky1
> +
> +      - description: Xunlong orangepi 6 plus board
> +        items:
> +          - enum:
> +              - xunlong,orangepi-6-plus

Previous patch was correct, not this one.

<form letter>
This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.

If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to you
on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer
will do that for tags received on the version they apply.

Please read:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
</form letter>

Read last sentence and linked documentation. Where did you explain
ignoring/dropping my tag?

Best regards,
Krzysztof