[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <29295127-e54f-4954-8a63-03289c113a1f@bootlin.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 09:29:41 +0100
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@...il.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: sfp: add SMBus I2C block support
Hi folks,
On 04/01/2026 17:05, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Dec 2025 21:33:31 +0000 Jonas Jelonek wrote:
>> +static int sfp_smbus_block_write(struct sfp *sfp, bool a2, u8 dev_addr,
>> + void *buf, size_t len)
>> +{
>> + size_t block_size = sfp->i2c_block_size;
>> + union i2c_smbus_data smbus_data;
>> + u8 bus_addr = a2 ? 0x51 : 0x50;
>> + u8 *data = buf;
>> + u8 this_len;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + while (len) {
>> + this_len = min(len, block_size);
>> +
>> + smbus_data.block[0] = this_len;
>> + memcpy(&smbus_data.block[1], data, this_len);
>> + ret = i2c_smbus_xfer(sfp->i2c, bus_addr, 0,
>> + I2C_SMBUS_WRITE, dev_addr,
>> + I2C_SMBUS_I2C_BLOCK_DATA, &smbus_data);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + len -= this_len;
>> + data += this_len;
>> + dev_addr += this_len;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> AI code review says:
>
> Should this return the number of bytes written instead of 0?
>
> The existing sfp_i2c_write() returns the byte count on success, and several
> callers depend on this return value:
>
> sfp_cotsworks_fixup_check() checks:
> err = sfp_write(sfp, false, SFP_PHYS_ID, &id->base, 3);
> if (err != 3) { ... error path ... }
>
> sfp_sm_mod_hpower() via sfp_modify_u8() checks:
> if (err != sizeof(u8)) { ... error path ... }
>
> With this function returning 0 on success, these checks will always fail,
> causing high-power SFP modules to fail initialization with "failed to enable
> high power" errors, and Cotsworks module EEPROM fixups to fail with "Failed
> to rewrite module EEPROM" errors.
>
> Either way, you'll need to repost, net-next was closed when you posted.
Looks like I made the same mistake in sfp_smbus_byte_write(). I'll send
a fix for that/
Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists