linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add Acer Swift SFA14-11 DT and bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5c1e12f4-5de1-489f-ac15-9ac18aeb1488@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 11:29:54 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: weifu wu <wwfu06@....com>, andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Add Acer Swift SFA14-11 DT and bindings

On 05/01/2026 11:12, weifu wu wrote:
>  This series adds initial device tree support for the Acer Swift SFA14-11 laptop based on the Qualcomm X1E78100 SoC.
>  
>  Patch 1 introduces the DT binding documentation for the new board compatible string.
>  Patch 2 adds the device tree source file and updates the Makefile to include it.
>  
>  The device tree enables basic peripherals including the eDP panel, backlight, USB and PCIe.
>   The changes have been tested by building dtbs and booting on the target hardware, with display and backlight verified via eDP.
> 
>  The first attempt to submit the patch failed due to an SMTP server error. The patch is being resubmitted with a different SMTP server configured.


You already sent it and received reply. So one day later, you read the
review, decided to ignore everything else I wrote except the threading
and sent exactly the same. So what about my time spent on reviewing
this? Does not matter? If so, NAK.

Read submitting patches also how to properly write commit msgs.

Best regards,
Krzysztof