linux-kernel - Re: [1/3] scsi: lpfc: Fix memory leak in lpfc_config_port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ce145c7f-33fc-47a7-bcbf-2ec62719047a@web.de>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 11:41:03 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
 Jianhao Xu <jianhao.xu@....edu.cn>, Zilin Guan <zilin@....edu.cn>,
 linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
 Justin Tee <justin.tee@...adcom.com>,
 "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
 Paul Ely <paul.ely@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [1/3] scsi: lpfc: Fix memory leak in lpfc_config_port_post()

> I meant "or at least stop complaining about style and grammar issues".

Do any other contributors occasionally get also into the mood to point similar
adjustment opportunities out?

Regards,
Markus