lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260105105212.136645-5-adubey@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon,  5 Jan 2026 16:22:10 +0530
From: adubey@...ux.ibm.com
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: hbathini@...ux.ibm.com, sachinpb@...ux.ibm.com, venkat88@...ux.ibm.com,
        andrii@...nel.org, eddyz87@...il.com, mykolal@...com, ast@...nel.org,
        daniel@...earbox.net, martin.lau@...ux.dev, song@...nel.org,
        yonghong.song@...ux.dev, john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...nel.org,
        sdf@...ichev.me, haoluo@...gle.com, jolsa@...nel.org,
        christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, naveen@...nel.org, maddy@...ux.ibm.com,
        mpe@...erman.id.au, npiggin@...il.com, memxor@...il.com,
        iii@...ux.ibm.com, shuah@...nel.org,
        Abhishek Dubey <adubey@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/6] powerpc64/bpf: Add arch_bpf_stack_walk() for BPF JIT

From: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@...ux.ibm.com>

This function is used by bpf_throw() to unwind the stack
until frame of exception-boundary during BPF exception
handling.

This function is necessary to support BPF exceptions on
PowerPC.

Signed-off-by: Abhishek Dubey <adubey@...ux.ibm.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
index 37c547b49da8..0f3af67914d6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/net/bpf_jit_comp64.c
@@ -237,6 +237,34 @@ void bpf_jit_build_epilogue(u32 *image, struct codegen_context *ctx)
 	bpf_jit_build_fentry_stubs(image, ctx);
 }
 
+void arch_bpf_stack_walk(bool (*consume_fn)(void *, u64, u64, u64), void *cookie)
+{
+	// callback processing always in current context
+	unsigned long fp = current_stack_frame();
+
+	for (;;) {
+		unsigned long *frame = (unsigned long *) fp;
+		unsigned long ip;
+
+		if(!validate_sp(fp, current))
+			return;
+
+		ip = frame[STACK_FRAME_LR_SAVE];
+		if (!ip)
+			break;
+
+		/*
+		 * consume_fn common code expects stack pointer(sp) in third
+		 * argument. There is no sp in ppc64, rather pass frame
+		 * pointer.
+		 */
+		if (ip && !consume_fn(cookie, ip, fp, fp))
+			break;
+
+		fp = frame[0];
+	}
+}
+
 int bpf_jit_emit_func_call_rel(u32 *image, u32 *fimage, struct codegen_context *ctx, u64 func)
 {
 	unsigned long func_addr = func ? ppc_function_entry((void *)func) : 0;
-- 
2.48.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ