lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ee6ba772-7972-4212-9658-2d6eef48848a@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2026 12:43:02 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
 Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
 Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: samsung: exynos4-is: Simplify with scoped for each
 OF child loop

On 05/01/2026 11:41, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/samsung/exynos4-is/fimc-is.c b/drivers/media/platform/samsung/exynos4-is/fimc-is.c
>> index 0827fdaf455a..14d84cc96831 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/platform/samsung/exynos4-is/fimc-is.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/samsung/exynos4-is/fimc-is.c
>> @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static int fimc_is_parse_sensor_config(struct fimc_is *is, unsigned int index,
>>  
>>  static int fimc_is_register_subdevs(struct fimc_is *is)
>>  {
>> -	struct device_node *i2c_bus, *child;
>> +	struct device_node *i2c_bus;
>>  	int ret, index = 0;
>>  
>>  	ret = fimc_isp_subdev_create(&is->isp);
>> @@ -208,11 +208,10 @@ static int fimc_is_register_subdevs(struct fimc_is *is)
>>  		return ret;
>>  
>>  	for_each_compatible_node(i2c_bus, NULL, "samsung,exynos4212-i2c-isp") {
> I haven't checked how frequently this would help, but at least in this case
> I'd consider adding a
> 	for_each_compatible_node_scoped() following same approach as
> other scoped loops.

yes, yes, that's on my TODO list. :)

I saw it in several places already.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ