[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <67fd0c34-0ea4-461c-8586-4eaca678ccb3@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 14:40:30 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Pradeep Pragallapati <pradeep.pragallapati@....qualcomm.com>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: vkoul@...nel.org, neil.armstrong@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, martin.petersen@...cle.com,
andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org, taniya.das@....qualcomm.com,
dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
nitin.rawat@....qualcomm.com, Konrad Dybcio
<konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>, Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 3/4] arm64: dts: qcom: hamoa: Add UFS nodes for
x1e80100 SoC
On 06/01/2026 14:00, Pradeep Pragallapati wrote:
>>
>>> + compatible = "qcom,x1e80100-ufshc",
>>> + "qcom,sm8550-ufshc",
>>> + "qcom,ufshc",
>>> + "jedec,ufs-2.0";
>>
>> Drop jedec compatible as Qcom UFS controller cannot fallback to generic ufshc
>> driver.
> "jedec,ufs-2.0" was set to const in dt-bindings, dropping now will lead
> to dtbs_check failures. is it ok, if i continue with it ?
No, it is not ok. You cannot have errors/warnings and I think it is
obvious that you need to fix everything, not only DTS.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists