lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21daf689-89c5-43a6-b83b-2dc405a2fb57@lucifer.local>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 14:43:21 +0000
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Liam R . Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@...cle.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...nel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
        Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        Pedro Falcato <pfalcato@...e.de>, Chris Li <chriscli@...gle.com>,
        Barry Song <v-songbaohua@...o.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] mm/rmap: separate out fork-only logic on
 anon_vma_clone()

On Tue, Dec 30, 2025 at 02:02:29PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 4:27 AM Lorenzo Stoakes
> <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Specify which operation is being performed to anon_vma_clone(), which
> > allows us to do checks specific to each operation type, as well as to
> > separate out and make clear that the anon_vma reuse logic is absolutely
> > specific to fork only.
> >
> > This opens the door to further refactorings and refinements later as we
> > have more information to work with.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>
> > ---
> >  mm/internal.h                    | 11 +++++-
> >  mm/rmap.c                        | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  mm/vma.c                         |  6 +--
> >  tools/testing/vma/vma_internal.h | 11 +++++-
> >  4 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
> > index 469d4ef1ccc5..b4d4bca0f9a7 100644
> > --- a/mm/internal.h
> > +++ b/mm/internal.h
> > @@ -244,7 +244,16 @@ static inline void anon_vma_unlock_read(struct anon_vma *anon_vma)
> >
> >  struct anon_vma *folio_get_anon_vma(const struct folio *folio);
> >
> > -int anon_vma_clone(struct vm_area_struct *dst, struct vm_area_struct *src);
> > +/* Operations which modify VMAs. */
> > +enum vma_operation {
> > +       VMA_OP_SPLIT,
> > +       VMA_OP_MERGE_UNFAULTED,
> > +       VMA_OP_REMAP,
> > +       VMA_OP_FORK,
> > +};
> > +
> > +int anon_vma_clone(struct vm_area_struct *dst, struct vm_area_struct *src,
> > +       enum vma_operation operation);
> >  int anon_vma_fork(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_area_struct *pvma);
> >  int  __anon_vma_prepare(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
> >  void unlink_anon_vmas(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
> > diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> > index de9de6d71c23..f08e6bc57379 100644
> > --- a/mm/rmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> > @@ -232,12 +232,13 @@ int __anon_vma_prepare(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> >  }
> >
> >  static void check_anon_vma_clone(struct vm_area_struct *dst,
> > -                                struct vm_area_struct *src)
> > +                                struct vm_area_struct *src,
> > +                                enum vma_operation operation)
> >  {
> >         /* The write lock must be held. */
> >         mmap_assert_write_locked(src->vm_mm);
> > -       /* If not a fork (implied by dst->anon_vma) then must be on same mm. */
> > -       VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(dst->anon_vma && dst->vm_mm != src->vm_mm);
> > +       /* If not a fork then must be on same mm. */
> > +       VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(operation != VMA_OP_FORK && dst->vm_mm != src->vm_mm);
> >
> >         /* No source anon_vma is a no-op. */
> >         VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(!src->anon_vma && !list_empty(&src->anon_vma_chain));
> > @@ -249,6 +250,35 @@ static void check_anon_vma_clone(struct vm_area_struct *dst,
> >          * must be the same across dst and src.
> >          */
> >         VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(dst->anon_vma && dst->anon_vma != src->anon_vma);
> > +
> > +       /* For the anon_vma to be compatible, it can only be singular. */
> > +       VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(operation == VMA_OP_MERGE_UNFAULTED &&
> > +                       !list_is_singular(&src->anon_vma_chain));
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
> > +       /* Only merging an unfaulted VMA leaves the destination attached. */
>
> Do you mean to say that for all other operations dst should not be yet
> attached? If so, "leaves the destination attached" is a bit confusing
> choice of words to indicate that attaching the VMA in other cases has
> not yet happened. Maybe reword as: "For cases other than merging an
> unfaulted VMA, the VMA should not be attached yet."
>
> > +       VM_WARN_ON_ONCE(operation != VMA_OP_MERGE_UNFAULTED &&
> > +                       vma_is_attached(dst));
> > +#endif
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void find_reusable_anon_vma(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > +                                  struct anon_vma *anon_vma)
>
> Naming is hard but a function that assigns vma->anon_vma and
> increments num_active_vmas should not be called
> "find_reusable_anon_vma". I would suggest keeping the name but making
> it return the anon_vma (or NULL if it's not reusable), letting the
> caller do the assignment and the increment.

I mean totally agree this name is bad actually :) good spot.

Since you might already have populated so we can't return NULL, so I think a
rename is better here actually -> try_to_reuse_anon_vma() which more accurately
describes what's going on and takes into account the fact it's doing a stats
update also!

>
> > +{
> > +       /* If already populated, nothing to do.*/
> > +       if (vma->anon_vma)
> > +               return;
> > +
> > +       /*
> > +        * We reuse an anon_vma if any linking VMAs were unmapped and it has
> > +        * only a single child at most.
> > +        */
> > +       if (anon_vma->num_active_vmas > 0)
> > +               return;
> > +       if (anon_vma->num_children > 1)
> > +               return;
> > +
> > +       vma->anon_vma = anon_vma;
> > +       anon_vma->num_active_vmas++;
>
> You moved num_active_vmas++ here to fix the accounting later... Sneaky
> but correct AFAICT :)

;)

I would say in my defence (perhaps unnecessarily, as being sneaky is a key
kernel dev skill imo ;) that it's no more sneaky than the code already
was. Probably :)

Really this is about making the situation clearer in anon_vma_clone(). We could
instead have:

	if (dst->anon_vma)
		dst->anon_vma->num_active_vmas++;

And with the assignment here, we cover off the fork + reuse case.

However this doesn't make it clear that in fact for all non-fork cases we are
_always_ incrementing this value, which is what I wanted to make super obvious.

One thing here that I think would help is to rename vma to dst just to
carry that across from anon_vma_clone() and to make it clear we're
checking/manipulating the destination VMA here.

>
> >  }
> >
> >  /**
> > @@ -256,6 +286,7 @@ static void check_anon_vma_clone(struct vm_area_struct *dst,
> >   * all of the anon_vma objects contained within @src anon_vma_chain's.
> >   * @dst: The destination VMA with an empty anon_vma_chain.
> >   * @src: The source VMA we wish to duplicate.
> > + * @operation: The type of operation which resulted in the clone.
> >   *
> >   * This is the heart of the VMA side of the anon_vma implementation - we invoke
> >   * this function whenever we need to set up a new VMA's anon_vma state.
> > @@ -278,14 +309,16 @@ static void check_anon_vma_clone(struct vm_area_struct *dst,
> >   *
> >   * Returns: 0 on success, -ENOMEM on failure.
> >   */
> > -int anon_vma_clone(struct vm_area_struct *dst, struct vm_area_struct *src)
> > +int anon_vma_clone(struct vm_area_struct *dst, struct vm_area_struct *src,
> > +                  enum vma_operation operation)
> >  {
> >         struct anon_vma_chain *avc, *pavc;
> > +       struct anon_vma *active_anon_vma = src->anon_vma;
> >
> > -       if (!src->anon_vma)
> > +       if (!active_anon_vma)
> >                 return 0;
> >
> > -       check_anon_vma_clone(dst, src);
> > +       check_anon_vma_clone(dst, src, operation);
> >
> >         /*
> >          * Allocate AVCs. We don't need an anon_vma lock for this as we
> > @@ -309,22 +342,14 @@ int anon_vma_clone(struct vm_area_struct *dst, struct vm_area_struct *src)
> >                 struct anon_vma *anon_vma = avc->anon_vma;
> >
> >                 anon_vma_interval_tree_insert(avc, &anon_vma->rb_root);
> > -
> > -               /*
> > -                * Reuse existing anon_vma if it has no vma and only one
> > -                * anon_vma child.
> > -                *
> > -                * Root anon_vma is never reused:
> > -                * it has self-parent reference and at least one child.
> > -                */
> > -               if (!dst->anon_vma && src->anon_vma &&
> > -                   anon_vma->num_children < 2 &&
> > -                   anon_vma->num_active_vmas == 0)
> > -                       dst->anon_vma = anon_vma;
> > +               if (operation == VMA_OP_FORK)
> > +                       find_reusable_anon_vma(dst, anon_vma);
> >         }
> > -       if (dst->anon_vma)
> > +
> > +       if (operation != VMA_OP_FORK)
> >                 dst->anon_vma->num_active_vmas++;
> > -       anon_vma_unlock_write(src->anon_vma);
> > +
> > +       anon_vma_unlock_write(active_anon_vma);
> >         return 0;
> >
> >   enomem_failure:
> > @@ -361,7 +386,7 @@ int anon_vma_fork(struct vm_area_struct *vma, struct vm_area_struct *pvma)
> >          * First, attach the new VMA to the parent VMA's anon_vmas,
> >          * so rmap can find non-COWed pages in child processes.
> >          */
> > -       error = anon_vma_clone(vma, pvma);
> > +       error = anon_vma_clone(vma, pvma, VMA_OP_FORK);
> >         if (error)
> >                 return error;
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/vma.c b/mm/vma.c
> > index feb4bbd3b259..e297c3a94133 100644
> > --- a/mm/vma.c
> > +++ b/mm/vma.c
> > @@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ __split_vma(struct vma_iterator *vmi, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> >         if (err)
> >                 goto out_free_vmi;
> >
> > -       err = anon_vma_clone(new, vma);
> > +       err = anon_vma_clone(new, vma, VMA_OP_SPLIT);
> >         if (err)
> >                 goto out_free_mpol;
> >
> > @@ -623,7 +623,7 @@ static int dup_anon_vma(struct vm_area_struct *dst,
> >
> >                 vma_assert_write_locked(dst);
> >                 dst->anon_vma = src->anon_vma;
> > -               ret = anon_vma_clone(dst, src);
> > +               ret = anon_vma_clone(dst, src, VMA_OP_MERGE_UNFAULTED);
> >                 if (ret)
> >                         return ret;
> >
> > @@ -1862,7 +1862,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *copy_vma(struct vm_area_struct **vmap,
> >                 vma_set_range(new_vma, addr, addr + len, pgoff);
> >                 if (vma_dup_policy(vma, new_vma))
> >                         goto out_free_vma;
> > -               if (anon_vma_clone(new_vma, vma))
> > +               if (anon_vma_clone(new_vma, vma, VMA_OP_REMAP))
> >                         goto out_free_mempol;
> >                 if (new_vma->vm_file)
> >                         get_file(new_vma->vm_file);
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/vma/vma_internal.h b/tools/testing/vma/vma_internal.h
> > index 93e5792306d9..7fa56dcc53a6 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/vma/vma_internal.h
> > +++ b/tools/testing/vma/vma_internal.h
> > @@ -600,6 +600,14 @@ struct mmap_action {
> >         bool hide_from_rmap_until_complete :1;
> >  };
> >
> > +/* Operations which modify VMAs. */
> > +enum vma_operation {
> > +       VMA_OP_SPLIT,
> > +       VMA_OP_MERGE_UNFAULTED,
> > +       VMA_OP_REMAP,
> > +       VMA_OP_FORK,
> > +};
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Describes a VMA that is about to be mmap()'ed. Drivers may choose to
> >   * manipulate mutable fields which will cause those fields to be updated in the
> > @@ -1157,7 +1165,8 @@ static inline int vma_dup_policy(struct vm_area_struct *src, struct vm_area_stru
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > -static inline int anon_vma_clone(struct vm_area_struct *dst, struct vm_area_struct *src)
> > +static inline int anon_vma_clone(struct vm_area_struct *dst, struct vm_area_struct *src,
> > +                                enum vma_operation operation)
> >  {
> >         /* For testing purposes. We indicate that an anon_vma has been cloned. */
> >         if (src->anon_vma != NULL) {
> > --
> > 2.52.0
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ