[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id:
<176765880886.1339098.1816013427410821419.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2026 00:20:08 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
Cc: sgarzare@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org,
avkrasnov@...utedevices.com, virtualization@...ts.linux.dev,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 0/2] vsock: Fix SO_ZEROCOPY on accept()ed vsocks
Hello:
This series was applied to netdev/net.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:
On Mon, 29 Dec 2025 20:43:09 +0100 you wrote:
> vsock has its own handling of setsockopt(SO_ZEROCOPY). Which works just
> fine unless socket comes from a call to accept(). Because
> SOCK_CUSTOM_SOCKOPT flag is missing, attempting to set the option always
> results in errno EOPNOTSUPP.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@...x.co>
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [net,v2,1/2] vsock: Make accept()ed sockets use custom setsockopt()
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/ce5e612dd411
- [net,v2,2/2] vsock/test: Test setting SO_ZEROCOPY on accept()ed socket
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/caa20e9e155b
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists