[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <l5u6w3ydgfbrah22dbm2vcpytqejfw6aomvzl5uzh5vssljqxd@suspm42neo2z>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 07:43:57 -0800
From: Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>
To: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@...e.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, asantostc@...il.com, efault@....de, gustavold@...il.com,
calvin@...nvd.org, jv@...sburgh.net, kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] netconsole: convert to NBCON console
infrastructure
Hello Marcos,
On Fri, Jan 02, 2026 at 12:54:14AM -0300, Marcos Paulo de Souza wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2025 06:52:11 -0800 Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org> wrote:
> > + if (!nbcon_enter_unsafe(wctxt))
> > + continue;
>
> In this case, I believe that it should return directly? If it can't enter in the
> unsafe region the output buffer is not reliable anymore, so retrying the send
> the buffer to a different target isn't correct anymore. Petr, John, do you
> agree?
That makes sense. I undersatnd that the ownership will not be
re-acquired here by just looping through the netconsole targets, right?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists