linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] firmware: arm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aV0uVXXbxKQ5qzLD@bogus>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 15:46:29 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....nxp.com>
Cc: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, arm-scmi@...r.kernel.org,
	imx@...ts.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] firmware: arm_scmi/imx: Support dump syslog

On Mon, Jan 05, 2026 at 08:49:24PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> Hi Sudeep,
> 
> Hope you're doing well. Apologies for following up again, but this v3 patchset
> has been pending for quite some time. I wanted to check if everything looks
> good on your end.
> 

Yes overall it looks good to me.

> Could you please confirm whether you plan to pick both patches?

As I had asked once in previous version, I need i.MX maintainer ACK to pick
it up myself.

> Or do you need an A-b from the i.MX maintainer for patch 2?

Yes as mentioned above.

> Alternatively, I can ask Shawn to pick patch 2 if you only intend to take patch 1.

I think that would break build or need to wait for another cycle.
I can ack if it can be routed via i.MX tree or need ACK to pick it up myself.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep