linux-kernel - [RESEND PATCH bpf-next v4 2/9] libbpf: Add support for extended bpf syscall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260106172018.57757-3-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Date: Wed,  7 Jan 2026 01:20:11 +0800
From: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@...ux.dev>
To: bpf@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
	Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
	Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
	Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
	John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
	KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>,
	Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@...ux.dev>,
	Seth Forshee <sforshee@...nel.org>,
	Yuichiro Tsuji <yuichtsu@...zon.com>,
	Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@...hat.com>,
	Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
	Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>,
	Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@...il.com>,
	Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@...a.com>,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>,
	Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@...il.com>,
	Amery Hung <ameryhung@...il.com>,
	Rong Tao <rongtao@...tc.cn>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-patches-bot@...com
Subject: [RESEND PATCH bpf-next v4 2/9] libbpf: Add support for extended bpf syscall

To support the extended BPF syscall introduced in the previous commit,
introduce the following internal APIs:

* 'sys_bpf_ext()'
* 'sys_bpf_ext_fd()'
  They wrap the raw 'syscall()' interface to support passing extended
  attributes.
* 'probe_sys_bpf_ext()'
  Check whether current kernel supports the extended attributes.

Signed-off-by: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@...ux.dev>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c             | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/lib/bpf/features.c        |  8 ++++++++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h |  3 +++
 3 files changed, 45 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
index 21b57a629916..689ade4a822b 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
@@ -69,6 +69,40 @@ static inline __u64 ptr_to_u64(const void *ptr)
 	return (__u64) (unsigned long) ptr;
 }
 
+static inline int sys_bpf_ext(enum bpf_cmd cmd, union bpf_attr *attr,
+			      unsigned int size,
+			      struct bpf_common_attr *common_attrs,
+			      unsigned int size_common)
+{
+	cmd = common_attrs ? (cmd | BPF_COMMON_ATTRS) : (cmd & ~BPF_COMMON_ATTRS);
+	return syscall(__NR_bpf, cmd, attr, size, common_attrs, size_common);
+}
+
+static inline int sys_bpf_ext_fd(enum bpf_cmd cmd, union bpf_attr *attr,
+				 unsigned int size,
+				 struct bpf_common_attr *common_attrs,
+				 unsigned int size_common)
+{
+	int fd;
+
+	fd = sys_bpf_ext(cmd, attr, size, common_attrs, size_common);
+	return ensure_good_fd(fd);
+}
+
+int probe_sys_bpf_ext(void)
+{
+	const size_t attr_sz = offsetofend(union bpf_attr, prog_token_fd);
+	union bpf_attr attr;
+	int fd;
+
+	memset(&attr, 0, attr_sz);
+	fd = syscall(__NR_bpf, BPF_PROG_LOAD | BPF_COMMON_ATTRS, &attr, attr_sz, NULL,
+		     sizeof(struct bpf_common_attr));
+	if (fd >= 0)
+		close(fd);
+	return errno == EFAULT;
+}
+
 static inline int sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, union bpf_attr *attr,
 			  unsigned int size)
 {
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/features.c b/tools/lib/bpf/features.c
index b842b83e2480..d786a815f1ae 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/features.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/features.c
@@ -506,6 +506,11 @@ static int probe_kern_arg_ctx_tag(int token_fd)
 	return probe_fd(prog_fd);
 }
 
+static int probe_kern_extended_syscall(int token_fd)
+{
+	return probe_sys_bpf_ext();
+}
+
 typedef int (*feature_probe_fn)(int /* token_fd */);
 
 static struct kern_feature_cache feature_cache;
@@ -581,6 +586,9 @@ static struct kern_feature_desc {
 	[FEAT_BTF_QMARK_DATASEC] = {
 		"BTF DATASEC names starting from '?'", probe_kern_btf_qmark_datasec,
 	},
+	[FEAT_EXTENDED_SYSCALL] = {
+		"Kernel supports extended syscall", probe_kern_extended_syscall,
+	},
 };
 
 bool feat_supported(struct kern_feature_cache *cache, enum kern_feature_id feat_id)
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
index fc59b21b51b5..e2a6ef4b45ae 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
@@ -392,6 +392,8 @@ enum kern_feature_id {
 	FEAT_ARG_CTX_TAG,
 	/* Kernel supports '?' at the front of datasec names */
 	FEAT_BTF_QMARK_DATASEC,
+	/* Kernel supports extended syscall */
+	FEAT_EXTENDED_SYSCALL,
 	__FEAT_CNT,
 };
 
@@ -757,4 +759,5 @@ int probe_fd(int fd);
 #define SHA256_DWORD_SIZE SHA256_DIGEST_LENGTH / sizeof(__u64)
 
 void libbpf_sha256(const void *data, size_t len, __u8 out[SHA256_DIGEST_LENGTH]);
+int probe_sys_bpf_ext(void);
 #endif /* __LIBBPF_LIBBPF_INTERNAL_H */
-- 
2.52.0