[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <875x9e7fe5.fsf@mailhost.krisman.be>
Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2026 13:41:22 -0500
From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>
To: Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>,
io-uring@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/3] io_uring: use release-acquire ordering for
IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED
Caleb Sander Mateos <csander@...estorage.com> writes:
> io_uring_enter(), __io_msg_ring_data(), and io_msg_send_fd() read
> ctx->flags and ctx->submitter_task without holding the ctx's uring_lock.
> This means they may race with the assignment to ctx->submitter_task and
> the clearing of IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED from ctx->flags in
> io_register_enable_rings(). Ensure the correct ordering of the
> ctx->flags and ctx->submitter_task memory accesses by storing to
> ctx->flags using release ordering and loading it using acquire ordering.
>
> Using release-acquire ordering for IORING_SETUP_R_DISABLED ensures the
> assignment to ctx->submitter_task in io_register_enable_rings() can't
> race with msg_ring's accesses, so drop the unneeded {READ,WRITE}_ONCE()
> and the NULL checks.
Hi Caleb,
This looks good, I don't have any comments. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...e.de>
Thanks,
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists