linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/8] selftest: Extend tun/virtio coverage for GSO over UDP tunnel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260106145822.3cd9b317@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 14:58:22 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
Cc: Xu Du <xudu@...hat.com>, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
 pabeni@...hat.com, horms@...nel.org, shuah@...nel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 0/8] selftest: Extend tun/virtio coverage
 for GSO over UDP tunnel

On Tue, 06 Jan 2026 17:14:05 -0500 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> For instance, can the new netlink code be replaced by YNL, whether in
> C or called from a script?

+1 looks like YNL is already used in net/ tests, and it supports
the operations in question, so that's a much better direction.
Please let us (YNL maintainers) know if there's anything missing
or not working, IDK how much use the rtnetlink support in YNL is
getting.