[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <33a70735-8058-4c2c-91f4-2a3ed0e0274d@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 08:04:45 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Gary Yang <gary.yang@...tech.com>
Cc: Peter Chen <peter.chen@...tech.com>, Fugang Duan
<fugang.duan@...tech.com>, "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-cix-kernel-upstream@...tech.com"
<linux-cix-kernel-upstream@...tech.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 回复: 回复: [PATCH v3 1/2] dt-bindings: arm: cix: add OrangePi 6 Plus board
On 06/01/2026 05:52, Gary Yang wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof:
>
> Thanks for your comments
>
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>>
>> On 05/01/2026 09:49, Gary Yang wrote:
>>> Hi Krzysztof:
>>>
>>> Thanks for your comments
>>>
>>>> EXTERNAL EMAIL
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Jan 04, 2026 at 03:53:59PM +0800, Gary Yang wrote:
>>>>> OrangePi 6 Plus adopts CIX CD8180/CD8160 SoC, built-in 12-core
>>>>> 64-bit processor + NPU processor,integrated graphics processor,
>>>>> equipped with 16GB/32GB/64GB LPDDR5, and provides two M.2 KEY-M
>>>>> interfaces 2280 for NVMe SSD,as well as SPI FLASH and TF slots to
>>>>> meet the needs of fast read/write and high-capacity storage
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Gary Yang <gary.yang@...tech.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml | 11 +++++++++--
>>>>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml
>>>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml
>>>>> index 114dab4bc4d2..9e132e609b7b 100644
>>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml
>>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/cix.yaml
>>>>> @@ -16,9 +16,16 @@ properties:
>>>>> compatible:
>>>>> oneOf:
>>>>>
>>>>> - - description: Radxa Orion O6
>>>>> + - description: Radxa Orion O6 board
>>>>> items:
>>>>> - - const: radxa,orion-o6
>>>>> + - enum:
>>>>> + - radxa,orion-o6
>>>>> + - const: cix,sky1
>>>>> +
>>>>> + - description: Xunlong orangepi 6 plus board
>>>>> + items:
>>>>> + - enum:
>>>>> + - xunlong,orangepi-6-plus
>>>>
>>>> Previous patch was correct, not this one.
>>>>
>>>> <form letter>
>>>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>>>
>>>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>>>>
>>>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
>>>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new
>>>> versions of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless
>>>> patch changed significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT
>>>> bindings). Tag is "received", when provided in a message replied to
>>>> you on the mailing list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no
>> need to repost patches *only* to add the tags.
>>>> The upstream maintainer will do that for tags received on the version
>>>> they apply.
>>>>
>>>> Please read:
>>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/proce
>>>> ss/sub
>>>> mitting-patches.rst#L577
>>>>
>>>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>>>> </form letter>
>>>>
>>>> Read last sentence and linked documentation. Where did you explain
>>>> ignoring/dropping my tag?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, the previous version was acked by you before.
>>
>> I stressed what I expect twice. In form letter and later explicitly. You still
>> ignored it.
>>
>>>
>>> When apply it, we found that orangepi 6 plus and Radxa Orion O6 belongs
>> the different boards.
>>>
>>> So we need to add a new item for it. Like these from qcom.yaml
>>>
>>> - description: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Distributed Unit 1000
>> platform
>>> items:
>>> - enum:
>>> - qcom,qdu1000-idp
>>> - qcom,qdu1000-x100
>>> - const: qcom,qdu1000
>>>
>>> - description: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Radio Unit 1000 platform
>>> items:
>>> - enum:
>>> - qcom,qru1000-idp
>>> - const: qcom,qru1000
>>
>> No, look at SoCs. Different SocS.
>>
>
> Please Look at rockchip.yaml, the same Socs, and the different boards
>
> - description: 96boards RK3399 Ficus (ROCK960 Enterprise Edition)
> items:
> - const: vamrs,ficus
> - const: rockchip,rk3399
>
> - description: 96boards RK3399 Rock960 (ROCK960 Consumer Edition)
> items:
> - const: vamrs,rock960
> - const: rockchip,rk3399
>
> For the different boards,please give your professional suggestions,Thanks a lot
I gave you already.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists