linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: talos-evk: Add support for QCS615 talos evk board

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <31907a16-1737-4269-92f3-ea998d684396@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 13:00:19 +0530
From: tessolveupstream@...il.com
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
 konradybcio@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
 conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: talos-evk: Add support for
 QCS615 talos evk board



On 06-01-2026 03:43, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 04, 2026 at 07:16:20PM +0530, tessolveupstream@...il.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30-12-2025 20:21, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
>>> On 12/30/25 2:02 PM, Sudarshan Shetty wrote:
>>>> Add the device tree for the QCS615-based Talos EVK platform. The
>>>> platform is composed of a System-on-Module following the SMARC
>>>> standard, and a Carrier Board.
>>>>
>>>> The Carrier Board supports several display configurations, HDMI and
>>>> LVDS. Both configurations use the same base hardware, with the display
>>>> selection controlled by a DIP switch.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>> +		pinctrl-names = "default";
>>>> +		pinctrl-0 = <&wifi_reg_en_pins_state>;
>>>
>>> property-n
>>> property-names
>>>
>>> consistently, please
>>>
>>
>> I didn’t fully understand your comment.
>> Could you please elaborate a bit more so I can make the
>> necessary changes correctly. >> +		regulator-boot-on;
> 
> What is the order of these two properties in most of the other DT files?
> What is the order of them in your patch?
>

I got your point now. I will rearrange the order of the properties
to be consistent with other DT files in the next patch series.
 
>>>> +		regulator-always-on;
>>>> +	};
>