[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aV59SdFU15HpLHeO@p14s>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 08:35:37 -0700
From: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
To: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@...com>
Cc: andersson@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, nm@...com, vigneshr@...com, kristo@...nel.org,
afd@...com, u-kumar1@...com, hnagalla@...com,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: remoteproc: Add HSM M4F core on TI
K3 SoCs
On Tue, Jan 06, 2026 at 04:17:53PM +0530, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
> Some of the TI K3 family of SoCs have a HSM (High Security Module) M4F
> core in the Wakeup Voltage Domain which could be used to run secure
> services like Authentication. Add the device tree bindings document for
> this HSM M4F core.
>
> The added example illustrates the DT node for the HSM core present on K3
> J722S SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@...com>
> ---
> v2: Changelog:
> [Krzysztof Kozlowski]:
> 1. Update commit msg to remove redundant "bindings".
> 2. Update filename to match compatible.
> 3. Remove "address-cells" & "size-cells" property. These belong to the
> device's parent node.
> 4. Drop description from firmware-name property.
> 5. Fix indentation for DT example.
>
> Link to v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251231165102.950644-2-b-padhi@ti.com/
>
> .../bindings/remoteproc/ti,hsm-m4fss.yaml | 72 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,hsm-m4fss.yaml
>
I have applied this patch- Nishanth and Vignesh should handle the .dsti files.
Thanks,
Mathieu
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,hsm-m4fss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,hsm-m4fss.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..9244e60acee37
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/remoteproc/ti,hsm-m4fss.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/remoteproc/ti,hsm-m4fss.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: TI K3 HSM M4F processor subsystems
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@...com>
> +
> +description: |
> + Some K3 family SoCs have a HSM (High Security Module) M4F core in the
> + Wakeup Voltage Domain which could be used to run secure services like
> + Authentication. Some of those are J721S2, J784S4, J722S, AM62X.
> +
> +$ref: /schemas/arm/keystone/ti,k3-sci-common.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - ti,hsm-m4fss
> +
> + reg:
> + items:
> + - description: SRAM0_0 internal memory region
> + - description: SRAM0_1 internal memory region
> + - description: SRAM1 internal memory region
> +
> + reg-names:
> + items:
> + - const: sram0_0
> + - const: sram0_1
> + - const: sram1
> +
> + resets:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + firmware-name:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - reg-names
> + - resets
> + - firmware-name
> + - ti,sci
> + - ti,sci-dev-id
> + - ti,sci-proc-ids
> +
> +unevaluatedProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + soc {
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + remoteproc@...00000 {
> + compatible = "ti,hsm-m4fss";
> + reg = <0x00 0x43c00000 0x00 0x20000>,
> + <0x00 0x43c20000 0x00 0x10000>,
> + <0x00 0x43c30000 0x00 0x10000>;
> + reg-names = "sram0_0", "sram0_1", "sram1";
> + resets = <&k3_reset 225 1>;
> + firmware-name = "hsm.bin";
> + ti,sci = <&sms>;
> + ti,sci-dev-id = <225>;
> + ti,sci-proc-ids = <0x80 0xff>;
> + };
> + };
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists