lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+V-a8t-2UiV74SvgmcLnWLA3yxdJGOnnjH17ZczY8mfD-90_g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 16:17:42 +0000
From: "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, 
	Pavel Machek <pavel@...ladev.com>, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>, 
	Fabrizio Castro <fabrizio.castro.jz@...esas.com>, 
	Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: renesas: cpg-mssr: Unlock before reset verification

Hi Geert,

On Wed, Jan 7, 2026 at 4:16 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 5 Jan 2026 at 15:06, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com> wrote:
> > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
> >
> > Move spin_unlock_irqrestore() before verifying the reset result and
> > printing errors. The verification condition only uses local variables
> > and does not require locking.
> >
> > Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@...ladev.com>
> > Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/aVujAQJSDn6WyORK@duo.ucw.cz/
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> i.e. will queue in renesas-clk for v6.20.
>
> > --- a/drivers/clk/renesas/renesas-cpg-mssr.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/renesas-cpg-mssr.c
> > @@ -806,14 +806,12 @@ static int cpg_mrcr_set_reset_state(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> >
> >         /* Verify the operation */
> >         val = readl(reg_addr);
> > +       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->pub.rmw_lock, flags);
>
> I will surround this by blank lines while applying.
>
Makes sense, thank you for taking care of it.

Cheers,
Prabhakar

> >         if (set == !(bitmask & val)) {
> >                 dev_err(priv->dev, "Reset register %u%02u operation failed\n", reg, bit);
> > -               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->pub.rmw_lock, flags);
> >                 return -EIO;
> >         }
> >
> > -       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->pub.rmw_lock, flags);
> > -
> >         return 0;
> >  }
>
> Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
>
>                         Geert
>
> --
> Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
>
> In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
> when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
>                                 -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ