[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87jyxtgtlc.fsf@t14s.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 19:34:23 +0100
From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>
To: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy
Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Alice
Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Danilo
Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...nel.org>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] rust: xarray: add `contains_index` method
Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 5:27 PM Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Add a convenience method `contains_index` to check whether an element
>> exists at a given index in the XArray. This method provides a more
>> ergonomic API compared to calling `get` and checking for `Some`.
>
> It isn't clear when you'd want this API, and neither this nor the
> example are particularly motivating.
I added this when I had a line reading `if xa.get(index).is_none()
{...}`. I think it reads better as `if !xa.contains_index(index) {...}`.
Do you have an idea of how to improve the motivational factor of the
example? Writing motivating examples is not my top skill.
Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists