[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878qe9gr1t.fsf@t14s.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2026 20:29:18 +0100
From: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>
To: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>, Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy
Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>, Benno Lossin <lossin@...nel.org>, Alice
Ryhl <aliceryhl@...gle.com>, Trevor Gross <tmgross@...ch.edu>, Danilo
Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>, Daniel Gomez <da.gomez@...nel.org>,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] rust: xarray: add `find_next` and `find_next_mut`
Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2025 at 5:27 PM Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> Add methods to find the next element in an XArray starting from a
>> given index. The methods return a tuple containing the index where the
>> element was found and a reference to the element.
>>
>> The implementation uses the XArray state API via `xas_find` to avoid taking
>> the xarray lock that is already held by `Guard`.
>
> Similarly to the commit message introducing the use of `xas_load`,
> this is not correct because `xa_find` takes and release the RCU lock
> only, not the XArray lock.
Right, thanks for pointing that out.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andreas Hindborg <a.hindborg@...nel.org>
>> ---
>> rust/kernel/xarray.rs | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/rust/kernel/xarray.rs b/rust/kernel/xarray.rs
>> index ca97134ba2bd0..9d4589979fd1d 100644
>> --- a/rust/kernel/xarray.rs
>> +++ b/rust/kernel/xarray.rs
>> @@ -255,6 +255,71 @@ pub fn get_mut(&mut self, index: usize) -> Option<T::BorrowedMut<'_>> {
>> Some(unsafe { T::borrow_mut(ptr.as_ptr()) })
>> }
>>
>> + fn load_next(&self, index: usize) -> Option<(usize, NonNull<c_void>)> {
>> + let mut state = XArrayState::new(self, index);
>> + // SAFETY: `state.state` is always valid by the type invariant of
>> + // `XArrayState` and the caller holds the lock.
>> + let ptr = unsafe { bindings::xas_find(&raw mut state.state, usize::MAX) };
>> + NonNull::new(ptr).map(|ptr| (state.state.xa_index, ptr))
>> + }
>
> Can this be a method on XArrayState? It seems odd to document a remote
> type's invariant here when we could put that justification on the type
> itself.
Good idea, I'll move it.
Best regards,
Andreas Hindborg
Powered by blists - more mailing lists