linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 5/6] ceph: Assert writeback loop invariants

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260107210139.40554-6-CFSworks@gmail.com>
Date: Wed,  7 Jan 2026 13:01:38 -0800
From: Sam Edwards <cfsworks@...il.com>
To: Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>,
	Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
Cc: Viacheslav Dubeyko <Slava.Dubeyko@....com>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
	Milind Changire <mchangir@...hat.com>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
	ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sam Edwards <CFSworks@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/6] ceph: Assert writeback loop invariants

If `locked_pages` is zero, the page array must not be allocated:
ceph_process_folio_batch() uses `locked_pages` to decide when to
allocate `pages`, and redundant allocations trigger
ceph_allocate_page_array()'s BUG_ON(), resulting in a worker oops (and
writeback stall) or even a kernel panic. Consequently, the main loop in
ceph_writepages_start() assumes that the lifetime of `pages` is confined
to a single iteration.

This expectation is currently not clear enough, as evidenced by two
recent patches which fix oopses caused by `pages` persisting into
the next loop iteration:
- "ceph: Do not propagate page array emplacement errors as batch errors"
- "ceph: Free page array when ceph_submit_write fails"

Use an explicit BUG_ON() at the top of the loop to assert the loop's
preexisting expectation that `pages` is cleaned up by the previous
iteration. Because this is closely tied to `locked_pages`, also make it
the previous iteration's responsibility to guarantee its reset, and
verify with a second new BUG_ON() instead of handling (and masking)
failures to do so.

Signed-off-by: Sam Edwards <CFSworks@...il.com>
---
 fs/ceph/addr.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/ceph/addr.c b/fs/ceph/addr.c
index 3becb13a09fe..f2db05b51a3b 100644
--- a/fs/ceph/addr.c
+++ b/fs/ceph/addr.c
@@ -1679,7 +1679,9 @@ static int ceph_writepages_start(struct address_space *mapping,
 		tag_pages_for_writeback(mapping, ceph_wbc.index, ceph_wbc.end);

 	while (!has_writeback_done(&ceph_wbc)) {
-		ceph_wbc.locked_pages = 0;
+		BUG_ON(ceph_wbc.locked_pages);
+		BUG_ON(ceph_wbc.pages);
+
 		ceph_wbc.max_pages = ceph_wbc.wsize >> PAGE_SHIFT;

 get_more_pages:
-- 
2.51.2