linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Revise some PCI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <fb7bdfeb-46a8-444a-b556-77266da3ff3c@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 15:47:11 -0600
From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@...nel.org>
To: Zhou Shengqing <zhoushengqing@...info.com>,
 "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] Revise some PCI _DSM method implement

On 6/5/25 1:58 AM, Zhou Shengqing wrote:
> [1/2]PCI/ACPI: Add rev 2 check for PRESERVE_BOOT_CONFIG function
> [2/2]PCI/ACPI: Add acpi_check_dsm() for PCI _DSM definitions
> 
>   drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>   1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

Did this series get overlooked?  I was talking to someone about this 
_DSM and noticed it on lore.  It looks reasonable to me.

The only thing that jumped out to me that I would say is that the tag

Fixes: 9d7d5db8e78e ("PCI: Move PRESERVE_BOOT_CONFIG _DSM evaluation to 
pci_re")

Shouldn't be below the cutlist, it should be above it.  If there are no 
other concerns maybe Bjorn can just fix that while committing though.

Reviewed-by: Mario Limonciello (AMD) <superm1@...nel.org>