[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e885a4dd-fcde-4c8a-a819-caf707360134@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 11:08:15 +0530
From: Gokul Praveen <g-praveen@...com>
To: "Kumar, Udit" <u-kumar1@...com>, <j-keerthy@...com>,
<ukleinek@...nel.org>, <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <n-francis@...com>, Gokul Praveen <g-praveen@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: tiehrpwm: Enable EHRPWM controller before setting
configuration
On 06/01/26 18:57, Kumar, Udit wrote:
>
> On 1/6/2026 4:24 PM, Gokul Praveen wrote:
>> The period and duty cycle configurations does not get reflected
>> after setting them using sysfs nodes. This is because at the
>> end of ehrpwm_pwm_config function, the put_sync function is
>> called which resets the hardware.
>>
>> Fix it by preventing the pwm controller from going into
>> low-power mode.
>>
>> 'Fixes: 5f027d9b83db("pwm: tiehrpwm: Implement
>> .apply() callback")'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gokul Praveen <g-praveen@...com>
>
> No new line, between Fixes and Signed-off-by Please ,
>
> You can drop ' before fixes.
>
> rest LGTM.
Sure, Udit. Thanks for that.
Best Regards
Gokul Praveen
>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c
>> index 7a86cb090f76..408aed70be8c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c
>> @@ -237,7 +237,6 @@ static int ehrpwm_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip
>> *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>> if (period_cycles < 1)
>> period_cycles = 1;
>> - pm_runtime_get_sync(pwmchip_parent(chip));
>> /* Update clock prescaler values */
>> ehrpwm_modify(pc->mmio_base, TBCTL, TBCTL_CLKDIV_MASK, tb_divval);
>> @@ -290,12 +289,11 @@ static int ehrpwm_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip
>> *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>> if (!(duty_cycles > period_cycles))
>> ehrpwm_write(pc->mmio_base, cmp_reg, duty_cycles);
>> - pm_runtime_put_sync(pwmchip_parent(chip));
>> -
>> return 0;
>> }
>> -static int ehrpwm_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device
>> *pwm)
>> +static int ehrpwm_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device
>> *pwm,
>> + const struct pwm_state *state)
>> {
>> struct ehrpwm_pwm_chip *pc = to_ehrpwm_pwm_chip(chip);
>> u16 aqcsfrc_val, aqcsfrc_mask;
>> @@ -304,6 +302,13 @@ static int ehrpwm_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip
>> *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
>> /* Leave clock enabled on enabling PWM */
>> pm_runtime_get_sync(pwmchip_parent(chip));
>> + ret = ehrpwm_pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle, state-
>> >period, state->polarity);
>> +
>> + if (ret) {
>> + pm_runtime_put_sync(pwmchip_parent(chip));
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> /* Disabling Action Qualifier on PWM output */
>> if (pwm->hwpwm) {
>> aqcsfrc_val = AQCSFRC_CSFB_FRCDIS;
>> @@ -391,12 +396,11 @@ static int ehrpwm_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip
>> *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
>> return 0;
>> }
>> - err = ehrpwm_pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle, state-
>> >period, state->polarity);
>> - if (err)
>> - return err;
>> -
>> if (!enabled)
>> - err = ehrpwm_pwm_enable(chip, pwm);
>> + err = ehrpwm_pwm_enable(chip, pwm, state);
>> + else
>> + err = ehrpwm_pwm_config(chip, pwm, state->duty_cycle,
>> + state->period, state->polarity);
>> return err;
>> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists