[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAADnVQJLifBhcpe5ci7FBB2uzTR5OXPji5RPq2NLSoVXpTfScg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2026 22:20:23 -0800
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@...ux.dev>
Cc: bot+bpf-ci@...nel.org, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Eduard <eddyz87@...il.com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
sforshee@...nel.org, yuichtsu@...zon.com, aalbersh@...hat.com,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>, Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@...il.com>,
Paul Chaignon <paul.chaignon@...il.com>, Mykyta Yatsenko <yatsenko@...a.com>,
Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@...il.com>, Anton Protopopov <a.s.protopopov@...il.com>,
Amery Hung <ameryhung@...il.com>, Rong Tao <rongtao@...tc.cn>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, kernel-patches-bot@...com,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...nel.org>, Chris Mason <clm@...a.com>,
Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@...ux.dev>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH bpf-next v4 7/9] bpf: Add common attr support for map_create
On Tue, Jan 6, 2026 at 9:57 PM Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 7/1/26 01:44, bot+bpf-ci@...nel.org wrote:
> >> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> >> index 14fc5738f2b9..e64cc7504731 100644
> >> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> >> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> >
> > [ ... ]
> >
> >> @@ -6279,7 +6345,11 @@ static int __sys_bpf(enum bpf_cmd cmd, bpfptr_t uattr, unsigned int size,
> >>
> >> switch (cmd) {
> >> case BPF_MAP_CREATE:
> >> - err = map_create(&attr, uattr);
> >> + common_attrs.log_true_size = 0;
> >> + err = map_create(&attr, uattr, &common_attrs);
> >> + ret = copy_common_attr_log_true_size(uattr_common, size_common,
> >> + &common_attrs.log_true_size);
> >> + err = ret ? ret : err;
> >
> > When map_create() succeeds, it returns a file descriptor that is already
> > installed in the caller's fd table via bpf_map_new_fd(). If
> > copy_common_attr_log_true_size() then fails (e.g., user provided a
> > read-only buffer for uattr_common), the syscall returns -EFAULT but the
> > fd remains installed.
> >
> > Could this leak the file descriptor? The user gets an error and has no
> > way to know what fd number was allocated, so they cannot close it.
> >
>
> Good catch — you’re right.
>
> If 'map_create()' succeeds and 'copy_common_attr_log_true_size()' later
> fails (e.g. returning -EFAULT), the newly created file descriptor would
> remain installed and could be leaked.
>
> I’ll fix this in the next revision by explicitly closing the fd when
> ret is non-zero.
No. The refactoring was wrong. Don't make the kernel do extra work.
Patch 3 introduced a bug and closing fd is not a solution.
Such a pattern can be exploited for DoS.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists