[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dce7702f-e845-4940-8679-a8d80563988a@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 12:28:30 +0530
From: tessolveupstream@...il.com
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, andersson@...nel.org,
konradybcio@...nel.org
Cc: robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/5] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: talos-evk: Add QCS615
Talos EVK SMARC platform
On 05-01-2026 12:42, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 04/01/2026 14:11, tessolveupstream@...il.com wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30-12-2025 20:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 30/12/2025 14:02, Sudarshan Shetty wrote:
>>>> Add binding support for the Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Talos EVK
>>>> SMARC platform based on the QCS615 SoC.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sudarshan Shetty <tessolveupstream@...il.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>>
>>> Why did you decide to drop the tag and where did you explain that?
>>>
>>> <form letter>
>>> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>>>
>>> It looks like you received a tag and forgot to add it.
>>>
>>> If you do not know the process, here is a short explanation:
>>> Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by tags when posting new versions
>>> of patchset, under or above your Signed-off-by tag, unless patch changed
>>> significantly (e.g. new properties added to the DT bindings). Tag is
>>> "received", when provided in a message replied to you on the mailing
>>> list. Tools like b4 can help here. However, there's no need to repost
>>> patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream maintainer will do that for
>>> tags received on the version they apply.
>>>
>>> Please read:
>>> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.12-rc3/source/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst#L577
>>>
>>> If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.
>>> </form letter>
>>>
>>
>> I apologize for missing the Acked-by tag in this version.
>
> How missing? It WAS THERE ALREADY!
>
> You had to explicitly remove it.
While updating the linux-next kernel source and reapplying the
changes, the Acked-by tag was inadvertently omitted. I’ll ensure
that all previously received tags are retained in future revisions
in accordance with the submission guidelines. My apologies for
the oversight.
>
>> I will make sure to include all received tags in the next patch
>> as per the submission guidelines.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists