[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aV4b6GAGz1zyf8Xy@stanley.mountain>
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2026 11:40:08 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>
To: Jonas Jelonek <jelonek.jonas@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@...tlin.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/2] gpio: add gpio-line-mux driver
On Sat, Dec 27, 2025 at 06:01:34PM +0000, Jonas Jelonek wrote:
> +struct gpio_lmux {
> + struct gpio_chip gc;
> + struct mux_control *mux;
> + struct gpio_desc *muxed_gpio;
> +
> + u32 num_gpio_mux_states;
> + unsigned int gpio_mux_states[] __counted_by(num_gpio_mux_states);
> +};
> +
> +static int gpio_lmux_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int offset)
> +{
> + struct gpio_lmux *glm = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (offset > gc->ngpio)
This is off by one. Should be >=.
regards,
dan carpenter
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + ret = mux_control_select_delay(glm->mux, glm->gpio_mux_states[offset],
> + MUX_SELECT_DELAY_US);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> +
> + ret = gpiod_get_raw_value_cansleep(glm->muxed_gpio);
> + mux_control_deselect(glm->mux);
> + return ret;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists