linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] dt-bindings: thermal: Add qcom,qmi-cooling yaml bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <98804ad4-a481-4125-8911-965e3376be83@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 14:13:12 +0530
From: Gaurav Kohli <gaurav.kohli@....qualcomm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
        mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org,
        rui.zhang@...el.com, lukasz.luba@....com, konradybcio@...nel.org,
        amitk@...nel.org, mani@...nel.org, casey.connolly@...aro.org
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/8] dt-bindings: thermal: Add qcom,qmi-cooling yaml
 bindings


On 12/31/2025 5:29 PM, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 12/23/25 1:32 PM, Gaurav Kohli wrote:
>> The cooling subnode of a remoteproc represents a client of the Thermal
>> Mitigation Device QMI service running on it. Each subnode of the cooling
>> node represents a single control exposed by the service.
>>
>> Add maintainer name also and update this binding for cdsp substem.
>>
>> Co-developed-by: Casey Connolly <casey.connolly@...aro.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Kohli <gaurav.kohli@....qualcomm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Casey Connolly <casey.connolly@...aro.org>
>> ---
> [...]
>
>> +    remoteproc-cdsp {
>> +        cooling {
>> +            compatible = "qcom,qmi-cooling-cdsp";
>> +
>> +            cdsp_sw0: cdsp_sw {
> I'm curious about the meaning of the name - does "sw" here stand
> for "software"?


This is same like cdsp DCVS capping from firmware instead of hlos.


>
> If so, does this essentially mean "a software toggle for throttling the
> CDSP"?
>
> Would all such occurrences essentially always have a "sw" suffix?
>
> Konrad