lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1ada44db-63a9-43ac-81da-0bdd4e7b7363@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2026 12:59:55 +0000
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
 "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>, Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>,
 Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
 Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-direct: Skip cache prep for HighMem coherent
 allocations

On 2026-01-08 12:41 pm, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 08.01.2026 11:50, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> On 2026-01-02 3:51 pm, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote:
>>> dma_direct_alloc() calls arch_dma_prep_coherent() to clean any dirty
>>> cache lines from the kernel linear alias before creating a coherent
>>> remapping.
>>>
>>> HighMem pages have no kernel alias mapping, so there are no alias cache
>>> lines to clean. Skip arch_dma_prep_coherent() for HighMem allocations.
>>
>> This is assuming that caches are always cleaned when unmapping
>> highmem, and no still-mapped highmem pages are dirty - how is that
>> guaranteed? The fact that they're not in the linear map doesn't mean
>> they don't necessarily have kernel aliases in either vmalloc
>> pagetables or caches.
> 
> 
> Right, so it is better to keep this unconditional
> arch_dma_prep_coherent() call. I will drop it from dma-mapping-fixes then.

Yeah, I think the confusing thing here is that there are architectures 
with CONFIG_HIGHMEM that don't actually check for and handle it in their 
arch_dma_prep_coherent() as they seemingly should, however I'm not sure 
off-hand whether they also support/use highmem CMA in the manner that 
could end up being an issue in practice (the lack of any reports of 
crashes or DMA corruption over the last however many years suggests not...)

Thanks,
Robin.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ