[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20260108-gpio-shared-false-positive-v1-1-5dbf8d1b2f7d@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2026 14:39:19 +0100
From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@....qualcomm.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>, Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@....qualcomm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] gpio: shared: fix a false-positive sharing detection with
reset-gpios
After scanning the devicetree, we remove all entries that have only one
reference, while creating GPIO shared proxies for the remaining, shared
entries. However: for the reset-gpio corner-case, we will have two
references for a "reset-gpios" pin that's not really shared. In this
case one will come from the actual consumer fwnode and the other from
the potential auxiliary reset-gpio device. This causes the GPIO core to
create unnecessary GPIO shared proxy devices for pins that are not
really shared.
Add a function that can detect this situation and remove entries that
have exactly two references but one of them is a reset-gpio.
Fixes: 7b78b26757e0 ("gpio: shared: handle the reset-gpios corner case")
Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@....qualcomm.com>
---
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c
index 076d8642675c2723c8938cbd22b1b51014c23871..17343fdc9758402b3cc7c8d61ee908591c977539 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@ struct gpio_shared_ref {
struct lock_class_key lock_key;
struct auxiliary_device adev;
struct gpiod_lookup_table *lookup;
+ bool is_reset_gpio;
};
/* Represents a single GPIO pin. */
@@ -112,7 +113,8 @@ static int gpio_shared_setup_reset_proxy(struct gpio_shared_entry *entry,
struct gpio_shared_ref *ref;
list_for_each_entry(ref, &entry->refs, list) {
- if (!ref->fwnode && ref->con_id && strcmp(ref->con_id, "reset") == 0)
+ if (ref->is_reset_gpio)
+ /* Already set-up. */
return 0;
}
@@ -120,6 +122,8 @@ static int gpio_shared_setup_reset_proxy(struct gpio_shared_entry *entry,
if (!ref)
return -ENOMEM;
+ ref->is_reset_gpio = true;
+
list_add_tail(&ref->list, &entry->refs);
pr_debug("Created a secondary shared GPIO reference for potential reset-gpio device for GPIO %u at %s\n",
@@ -714,12 +718,38 @@ static void __init gpio_shared_teardown(void)
}
}
+static bool gpio_shared_entry_is_really_shared(struct gpio_shared_entry *entry)
+{
+ size_t num_nodes = list_count_nodes(&entry->refs);
+ struct gpio_shared_ref *ref;
+
+ if (num_nodes <= 1)
+ return false;
+
+ if (num_nodes > 2)
+ return true;
+
+ /* Exactly two references: */
+ list_for_each_entry(ref, &entry->refs, list) {
+ /*
+ * Corner-case: the second reference comes from the potential
+ * reset-gpio instance. However, this pin is not really shared
+ * as it would have three references in this case. Avoid
+ * creating unnecessary proxies.
+ */
+ if (ref->is_reset_gpio)
+ return false;
+ }
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static void gpio_shared_free_exclusive(void)
{
struct gpio_shared_entry *entry, *epos;
list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, epos, &gpio_shared_list, list) {
- if (list_count_nodes(&entry->refs) > 1)
+ if (gpio_shared_entry_is_really_shared(entry))
continue;
gpio_shared_drop_ref(list_first_entry(&entry->refs,
---
base-commit: fc4e91c639c0af93d63c3d5bc0ee45515dd7504a
change-id: 20260108-gpio-shared-false-positive-9e08379aa6cd
Best regards,
--
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@....qualcomm.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists